Hello!
I just wanted to give a little summary of the “How It Ends” event some of us BAPers (Colin, Barb, Alyson, and I) attended last week and a bit of my reaction to it. The event was held June 22 and 23rd in DC. It was sponsored by Invisible Children, Resolve
Overall the event was wonderful. We learned a lot more about the conflict from representatives of the Ugandan government, our own government, and of course the organizations sponsoring the event. It was incredible knowing that people from 46 different states had gathered to show their support for one common cause. (My hero Luis Ocampo the chief prosecutor of the ICC was there!) My favorite panel was called “The Future of Development” in which Dan Pallota (the author of Uncharitable) spoke about the future of non-profits. He argued that there is no reason they have to remain small, with constant fears of rising overhead, not using the tools available in capitalism. Spending money on things like marketing and salaries is necessary in order for an organization to grow and become strong enough to make a difference. The panelists also spoke about successful careers in non-profits which I found personally inspiring since my personal career goals seem to be consistently in the non-profit sector while popular discourse (and in particular that of my family and friends) seems to limit their ideas of success to profits.
I don’t mean to be negative, but there were some aspects of the event about which I had my doubts. I know that at an event like this it doesn’t make sense to create doubt about whether or not the actions you are taking are the right ones, but I couldn’t help but wonder. For example, those speaking on behalf of the Ugandan government made it seem as though all their actions had the Acholi people in mind and that they were doing their best to stop the conflict and bring the people home. Yet, while listening to them speak, I couldn’t help but think back to the facts I read in Sverker Finnstrom’s book. For example in Ch. 5 he points out that high ranking army officers have taken the abandoned land of those forced to live in camps and established their own big farms on it. In Chapter 4 he talks about using the camps as a way to control the people. He also addresses the reduction of the crisis to one that is strictly humanitarian in nature, ignoring the political aspect. I know that it is difficult to admit that a group whose modus operandi is abducting children and committing murder has a legitimate political agenda behind its actions. Nevertheless, the book makes it seem that the people of
Ok. Sorry if that was a little bit intense. Hopefully the other attendees of the event have more lighthearted thoughts about it. My basic feeling right now is anticipation. No matter how much I read and get swept up in the stories of
I can’t wait for our adventure!
Erika
No comments:
Post a Comment